Chad Mendes poses a risk to both the UFC and McGregor

It has felt like a long time coming but UFC 189 is almost upon us. And as you may already know, Chad Mendes (17-2) and Conor McGregor (17-2) will compete for the interim-Featherweight title.

On paper, it is an intriguing fight between two fighters who have exchanged words in the past – and even more so in the past seven days.  The weigh-ins were electrifying and  It makes as much sense as anything possibly can at this moment in time.  But it may prove a risky match-up for both McGregor and the UFC.

Firstly, one must wonder if the Dubliner was not so adamant to fight on this card, would the UFC have re-scheduled his fight with Aldo for a later date.  It may have been a wise option but McGregor did not want to disappoint the large fan base travelling from Ireland.

Nevertheless, the UFC took that risk when it chose to solely promote the main event and seemingly ignore Welterweight title bout between Robbie Lawler and Rory McDonald (Yeah, it’s on this card too).  It would be quite difficult to get the general public excited for a fight that has not received much airtime.  Following this, the organisation took another gamble scheduling the upcoming fight between McGregor and Mendes.  It is a precarious situation.

Mendes & McGregor face off at the weigh-ins. (Image by http://www.mmajunkie.com)

Now picture this; Chad Mendes puts on a wrestling masterclass and wins via unanimous decision, therefore becoming the interim champion.  Aldo – McGregor’s seemingly endless, but thoroughly enjoyable world tour, means nothing.  All that money and effort pumped into the rivalry between McGregor and Aldo will have potentially gone to waste.  Both men would have to wait quite some time – if ever – to settled their feud inside the octagon.

Will McGregor fade away into obscurity if he loses?  Of course not.  He is too charismatic and talented for that to happen.  People want to see him fight, be it to win or lose.  Simply put, he is a big draw and the UFC recognises that.

Should McGregor go out there and carry on to win emphatically then the risk will be duly rewarded.  He will take the scalp of a top contender, silence his critics (for the moment) and answer the ‘wrestler’ question before eventually facing José Aldo later in the year.  In theory, it’s a more marketable fight.  It is the ideal scenario for the UFC.  But as anyone who has followed this sport for some time will tell you, nothing ever quite works out like it’s supposed to.

Film review: Kurt Cobain – Montage of Heck

Director: Brett Morgen
Rating: 16
Running Time: 2hr 12mins

Kurt Cobain is one of most reported-on musicians of all-time.  Countless articles, multiple television appearances, a few biographies but not one authorised documentary about the Nirvana frontman.  Until now, of course.

Director, Brett Morgen, chooses a rich blend of imagery and music to create an experience replicated in very few other music documentaries.  Despite being a little over two hours in length, the film does not shed light on any new information but it does successfully gives the audience an almost voyeuristic view into the life of Kurt Cobain. 

The film begins, as one would expect, with his early life.  It is an all too familiar tale (at first), well behaved child becomes troublesome after a traumatic event – in this case, the divorce of his parents.  The impact that it had on Cobain is highlighted through his drawings, each one with a sinister edge.  By the time Kurt is a teenager, he lacks any real family bond.  However, Brett Morgen, rather excellently introduces animation to compensate for the lack of home-video footage during this time.  It works magnificently. 

Near the halfway point of the film, the band release Nevermind.  Nirvana’s meteoric rise to fame is complete.  It consumes Cobain.  He grows tired and infuriated with the media and public alike.  His level of angst is documented intelligently.  The mood shifts both on screen and in the cinema. 

Cobain retreats to his safe-haven, his home.  At first, the rarely seen-before footage of Kurt and Courtney Love brings a smile to the audience.  The recordings show it all, from Kurt lovingly singing to his daughter, to the incoherent heroin induced ramblings. 

Remarkably, it does not cover his final days or the aftermath of his death.  Instead, it ends with a cold screen of text.  Harrowing in itself.

‘Montage of Heck’ stands out from other Nirvana/Cobain documentaries for a number of reasons but primarily  because Brett Morgen successfully captured the life of Kurt Cobain; the human, the drug-addict, the father.

Rating: 4/5

Barry Glendenning: Chancing his way from Birr to Brixton

After leaving the Carlton cinema one afternoon, college dropout, Barry Glendenning entered a shop to buy a pack of chewing gum when an issue of Hot Press caught his eye. If he had not purchased the magazine in Dublin city centre back in the early nineties, he may never have ended up deputy sports editor of The Guardian today.

Barry Glendenning left his native town of Birr, Co. Offaly to attend Blackrock College.  During his time in the prestigious secondary school, his passion for sports grew but his ambition to succeed in education began to wither.  Nonetheless, he gained a place in an Arts degree at University College of Dublin.  Lacking drive in this specific area, he decided to leave the course prematurely.  Following his departure from UCD, Glendenning signed on the dole.  Not exactly the life he envisioned as he left Offaly as a young teenager.

Months later, new issue of Hot Press in his hands, Glendenning turned each page carefully, reading the content within.  He then noticed a competition that gave the reader an opportunity to submit a 300 word review.  Slightly irregular topic of choice, Barry chose to write a ‘review’ of the mass Pope John Paul II said in front of a four million large congregation in Manila, Philippines.

The article was selected as the winner of the Hot Press competition, which came as a surprise to Barry who admits that Liam Fay – now a good friend of his – article “was a brilliantly written album review of the Tinder Sticks.  He really knew what he was talking about, whereas I was just taking the piss out of the Pope really.”

Although included in Hot Press magazine, Glendenning felt the need to improve his writing skills.  He chose to attend Coláiste Dhúlaigh in 1991 and described his time in the college as beneficial.  During the year of his Journalism course, he contacted Hot Press for work experience, which they had no issue granting him.

Gaining his diploma from college, an opening became available at Hot Press.  Graham Linehan had just left to London so there was a vacancy of sorts at the magazine.  An interview with Eddie Izzard became available and they needed someone to interview him.  Barry gladly accepted the role as it was the English comics gig in The Olympia that made him fall in love with stand-up comedy.  With his foot firmly in the door of the Hot Press offices, Glendenning was now the go to guy for comedy interviews.

It is clear that Barry enjoyed his time at Hot Press, which did not pay well but had its benefits.  “It was quite a shambolic operation.  How we managed to cobble together this magazine once a fortnight was always impressive,” said Glendenning.

With a keen interest in comedy, Barry decided to attempt stand up.  Using a mix of his own written material and that of more obscure comics, his early gigs were a relative success.  After appearing on stage as comic on less than ten occasions in Dublin, he performed at the Edinburgh Festival against a then relatively unknown emerging talent, Peter Kay.

Glendenning is a regular contributor to the Football Weekly podcast

Glendenning arrived in London in 1999; aged 24, believing that he had the ability to break the British comedy circuit. It proved to be a long process.  Difficult to get two gigs less than three months apart, it was hard to gain much momentum.  At the time, Glendenning continued to write a column titled ‘London Calling’ for Hot Press, which was his sole income at times.  Eventually, he began to be paid for comedy gigs after a frustrating period in his life.  He was now making more from stand up than journalism and appeared at the Comedy Café in East London on multiple occasions.  In the venue, whoever the audience selected as their favourite comic of the night, would be granted a gig the following week.  Glendenning was selected as the best comedian on a night that also featured Jimmy Carr.  “Jimmy [Carr] would be recording his performance and taking notes.  Whereas, I would just be steaming drunk.”  Said Barry, reflecting back on how Carr became the success that he is today.

Gaining a reputation on the comedy circuit, Glendenning was booked to support Brendan Byrne on a four-show tour in England.  It was during his time with the Australian comic when he felt that his career in comedy would not continue for much longer.  Before a gig at Exeter University, the two comedians began to drink copious amounts of alcohol before they went on stage.  After a somewhat – but not entirely surprising – disappointing show, they continued to drink until the early hours when they found themselves in a lake, chest deep in water.  “Brendan ended up wading around a lake in Exeter because we decided it would be a good idea to kidnap a swan and bring it back to our hotel.  Luckily we were unable to apprehend the swan but Brendan managed to cut his foot on some glass in the lake so we had to get him some medical attention.” Barry recalls the event of the night.

Struggling for income, Glendenning’s housemate, Madeline, provided him with the opportunity to break back into journalism.  Both friends who shared an apartment in Clapham, Madeline worked for the Observer and noticed an advertising which requested staff for the website launch at The Guardian.  Barry applied and got the job,  another event which he simply puts down to luck.

Despite being an avid sports fan, Glendenning claims that he does  not take football as seriously as others do; “Football doesn’t seem to arouse my passion as much as an inter-mediate hurling match between Birr and Clareen”.  Nevertheless, the Sunderland supporter has heavily featured in the ever-popular podcast, Football Weekly.  Much of the praise for the show’s success deserves to go to host, James Richardson, he believes; “myself and my Dad used to watch his Gazetta show on Channel 4 when I was 17 and my Dad said to me, ‘you’d want to get yourself a job like that.  That lad is made’”

Modest, Glendenning claims that he strives to be like Marina Hyde – who he believes is the best writer at The Guardian – and Barney Ronay, “who’s like P.G Wodehouse, it depresses me when I read his columns.”

15 years since he left for England, Glendenning does not forget his roots and says; “Niall Stokes taught me more than you could learn in 20 years of journalism school”.  Currently enjoying life in London, he still wants to return to Ireland one day to live among his family and friends once again.

Qatar 2022: More than just a footballing issue

FIFA announced in December 2010 that the 2022 World Cup would be hosted by Qatar.  With the United States and Australia also prime candidates, it seemed improbable that the Arab state would get the honour.  The tournament, which is nine years away, has been shrouded in controversy and sparked numerous debates on their ability to host.  Straight away, there were accusations of bribery from the world’s wealthiest nation, Qatar, to footballs governing body, FIFA.

The temperature issue remains for players and fans travelling across the country.  Harold Mayne – Nicholls, author of FIFA’s inspection report, stated; “It was a little bit obvious, it won’t be easy for the players.  Now, after almost three years, it is still a subject on the table” One solution is to move the tournament to winter for the first time.

A Guardian investigation revealed that 44 Nepalese workers died between 4 June and 8 August due to exhaustion, heart failure and workplace accidents. They are not projects directly related to the world cup, it is related to the construction of Lusail City, a city that will be built from scratch – costing close to $45 billion – and will be the location of the 90,000-seater state of the art stadium that will host the final.

It is estimated by The Guardian report that nearly a dozen migrant workers will die per week, which will amass to almost 4,000 deaths by the time World Cup commences.

You do not have to scratch too far beneath the surface to discover the issues of Qatar hosting the World Cup.  FIFA has to take responsibility for their wrongdoings.  There should have been a re-vote when a winter world cup was being discussed as the original bidding process specified that it is be to be hosted in the summer.  Following that, the investigation into slavery should have been another valid reason for a re-vote as it is no longer strictly a footballing issue but instead, a human rights case that needs to be focused on.

Mindless thugs or adrenaline junkies?

From one corner of Peru to the far corner of Poland, hooligans have been a part of football culture for a countless number of years and it doesn’t look like it’s going to disappear anytime soon.

The 1960′s was plagued with social uprisings by angry and misunderstood youths. Juvenile’s crime rates were increasing rapidly throughout Britain. Looking for violence – an adrenaline rush – the youths targeted football stadiums as it was an ideal place to fight due to the large number of people at the games. Following this, teenagers mainly from council estates began to form alliances among themselves, known as firms. This gave them a sense of community, a place where they felt like they belonged.

The “English disease” was now spreading rapidly in 1980′s Britain. A rise in unemployment, racism and inflation are among the main contributing factors for increased hooligan activity. Along with the growing numbers of hooligans came a decrease in the number of police due to government cut-backs.

On the 29th of May 1985 the Heysel Stadium disaster occurred. On this day 60,000 supporters made their way into the stadium in Brussels for the European Cup final between Juventus and Liverpool. Roughly an hour before kick-off, the opposing fans began taunting each other but quickly things became violent as missiles were thrown and Liverpool supporters began to charge the Juventus section. This led to the wall dividing the supporters to collapse under the pressure which resulted in hundreds of fans being crushed and trampled. Thirty-nine fans were killed and another six-hundred injured, a majority of them Italian and Belgian. The Liverpool fans were largely blamed for the deaths; as a result of this English clubs were banned from European competition for the next five years. Six years for Liverpool. British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher supported the ban, saying; “We have to get the game cleaned up from this hooliganism at home and then perhaps we shall be able to go overseas again.”

As technology has developed over the years, it has as a result played an important and crucial role in the policing methods used to prevent hooliganism. CCTV cameras are now a common sight at any modern grounds, this has been the most successful method so far. The police have been successful at combatting hooliganism in the football grounds but these methods do not prevent the violence that occurs outside the grounds, at times organised between two rival firms. Despite the efforts of police and governing bodies hooliganism does not seem to be going away at any time soon. It may be less prevalent but it still continues throughout the world.

Are these die-hard fans that spend their hard earned cash travelling the country and continent to see their team play or are they thugs just using football as an excuse to locate violence?